<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com</link>
	<description>Minneapolis Criminal Attorney</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:04:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Newmark Earns Dismissal of Felony Drug Charges in Douglas County</title>
		<link>http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com/newmark-earns-dismissal-of-felony-drug-charges-in-douglas-county/</link>
		<comments>http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com/newmark-earns-dismissal-of-felony-drug-charges-in-douglas-county/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Storms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minneapoliscriminallawyer.net/?p=553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric Newmark represented an individual accused of felony drug sales in Alexandria, Minnesota.   Newmark believed the search of his client was illegal and a hearing was held.  After cross-examining the officer and highlighting the actions that violated his client’s rights, Newmark filed a memorandum asking the Judge to dismiss the <span class="post_excerpt_readmore"><a href="http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com/newmark-earns-dismissal-of-felony-drug-charges-in-douglas-county/" title="Read more">Read more &#187;</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Newmark represented an individual accused of felony drug sales in Alexandria, Minnesota.   Newmark believed the search of his client was illegal and a hearing was held.  After cross-examining the officer and highlighting the actions that violated his client’s rights, Newmark filed a memorandum asking the Judge to dismiss the charges.  After reviewing the memorandum, the County Prosecutor chose to dismiss the charges voluntarily rather than writing a memorandum contesting Newmark’s arguments, acknowledging that the officer’s actions were unlawful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com/newmark-earns-dismissal-of-felony-drug-charges-in-douglas-county/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newmark Wins Dismissal of Felony Drug Charges in Hudson, Wisconsin</title>
		<link>http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com/newmark-wins-dismissal-of-felony-drug-charges-in-hudson-wisconsin/</link>
		<comments>http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com/newmark-wins-dismissal-of-felony-drug-charges-in-hudson-wisconsin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Storms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minneapoliscriminallawyer.net/?p=559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[G&#124;B&#124;B&#124;S partner Eric Newmark represented an individual accused of felony drug possession in Hudson, Wisconsin. Newmark argued, following a contested hearing on probable cause, that the State had insufficient evidence to proceed. The Court disagreed and ordered that the client stand trial. The State offered a plea agreement which would <span class="post_excerpt_readmore"><a href="http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com/newmark-wins-dismissal-of-felony-drug-charges-in-hudson-wisconsin/" title="Read more">Read more &#187;</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G|B|B|S partner Eric Newmark represented an individual accused of felony drug possession in Hudson, Wisconsin. Newmark argued, following a contested hearing on probable cause, that the State had insufficient evidence to proceed. The Court disagreed and ordered that the client stand trial. The State offered a plea agreement which would have resulted in the dismissal of some charges if the client kept his record clean. The offer was rejected and a trial date set. Prior to trial, the State dismissed all charges, telling the Judge it had insufficient evidence to win at trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com/newmark-wins-dismissal-of-felony-drug-charges-in-hudson-wisconsin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newmark Wins Suppression of Evidence in Felony Case, Leading To Dismissal of Charges</title>
		<link>http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com/newmark-wins-suppression-of-evidence-in-felony-case-leading-to-dismissal-of-charges/</link>
		<comments>http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com/newmark-wins-suppression-of-evidence-in-felony-case-leading-to-dismissal-of-charges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Storms</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minneapoliscriminallawyer.net/?p=555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[G&#124;B&#124;B&#124;S partner Eric Newmark represented an individual accused of felony possession of marijuana. He moved to suppress evidence seized during a search by Minneapolis police that Newmark argued was illegal because the search exceeded the scope of permission given to the police to search. The Hennepin County District Court agreed, <span class="post_excerpt_readmore"><a href="http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com/newmark-wins-suppression-of-evidence-in-felony-case-leading-to-dismissal-of-charges/" title="Read more">Read more &#187;</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G|B|B|S partner Eric Newmark represented an individual accused of felony possession of marijuana. He moved to suppress evidence seized during a search by Minneapolis police that Newmark argued was illegal because the search exceeded the scope of permission given to the police to search. The Hennepin County District Court agreed, and ordered that the results of the search would be inadmissible at trial. Left with no evidence to prove the crime, the State dismissed the charges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://criminal.gaskinsbennett.com/newmark-wins-suppression-of-evidence-in-felony-case-leading-to-dismissal-of-charges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
